The second of two articles on the Harvey County Poor Farm by museum director, Deb Hiebert. See June 7, 2012 for Part 1.
Not all of the
disadvantaged of Harvey
County in the early
1900’s congregated at the poor farm. Many had a rural or town home, but could
not earn enough to support themselves and their family. Harvey County
provided resources for these folks, also. A September 1918 edition of the Newton Evening Kansan-Republican
includes county commission minutes in which not only are the poor farm bills
paid (totaling $428.28), but local merchants are reimbursed for “pauper bills”
for groceries, clothing and coal (totaling $230.11). These goods went to county
residents who could not pay for the supplies themselves.
In addition, the
county provided medical services to the county poor residing at the poor farm
or their own residences with the annual appointment of a county physician. In
1911, Dr. I.T. Smith was appointed county physician and health officer to
provide care to the poor farm residents, with five other physicians from across
the county appointed to assist him to “look after the sick paupers in the
districts assigned to them.” And when illness, accident or advanced age claimed
an indigent resident, the county provided for their burial. County commission
notes from July of 1900 lists undertakers C.H. Northfoss, Duff & Duff and
L.F. Schumacher and Company to “have charge of the work of burying the pauper
dead in the city of Newton ,”
taking that responsibility in the order so listed (Newton Evening Kansan-Republican). Deceased “paupers” in other
cities in Harvey County were taken care of by the
undertakers of those cities.
In 1924, the existing wood frame poor house
was demolished and a new brick home was erected, which is today a private
residence. The building was 68 feet long by 33 feed wide, with two stories and
a half-basement, and cost $18,021.30, plus plumbing ($3,898) and electrical
($425). It provided accommodations for up to 30 “inmates,” some on the ground
floor, plus the supervisor and his family.
The March 12, 1924 Newton Evening Kansan-Republican had much to say on the need for a new facility: "The house on the farm consists of the original house erected nearly fifty years ago with several additions made in later years and is entirely unsuited to the use for which it is intended. There are no bedrooms for inmates on the first floor, the house has no toilet facilities, and the fire hazard is very great on account of the general construction of the building, and the fact that all lighting is done with coal oil lamps. It is almost impossible to care for sick persons, and no inmates can now be taken in at the farm unless they are able to go up and down stairs." The county was incurring hospital expenses and other bills for care of indigent patients who could have been cared for at the poor farm, if more suitable. The article concludes, "The building will be adequate for the needs of Harvey County for many years and . . . every one . . . will experience a sense of satisfaction to know that conditions at the county farm are to be improved before Harvey County develops a poor farm scandal such as some of our neighboring county have had in recent years." That makes me want to go find out more about those scandals!
Drawing in the Newton Evening Kansan Republican, 12 March 1924. |
But
change was on the horizon, and the poor farm would exist under county
supervision for less than another 20
years. The formation of the New Deal policies of President Franklin D.
Roosevelt in the early 1930’s combined with the rise of health care
institutions to eliminate poor farms and homes across the U.S. Records show between 14 and 20 residents at
the county farm from each year 1924 through 1932, illustrating its’ necessity
through that decade. But by 1941, the county commission decided to “no longer
maintain it as a refuge” and leased the property for private use (later selling
it), thus ending the era of the poor farm in Harvey County.
Good account of the Harvey co. Poor Farm. A lot of counties terminated their poor farms for a variety of reasons: the Social Security Act of 1935, the depression and the fact that many farmers could not pay property tax which helped fund the poor farms, the growing disfavor of an archaic system with its roots in the 17th century, and the growing popularity of "rest homes". The truth was that poor farms was not the most efficient way to care for the poor, especially on the smaller county farms.
ReplyDelete